AI-referred retail traffic is up 130% year over year. We check whether the answer engines can read your catalog — then fix what makes you unquotable. Most stores fail on a technicality nobody told them about.
All four are visible from outside your site, which is why the scan takes twenty seconds and why the result is hard to argue with.
Which of nine AI agents your robots.txt admits. Two of the 22 stores we scanned forbid all of them by accident.
Name, price, availability and category in machine-readable form on a real product page — not a marketing page, the page a buyer lands on.
25 prompts your buyers actually type, run against the major engines, screenshotted. This is the only evidence that survives a skeptical CMO.
Who gets named when you don't, and what they publish that you refuse to. Usually one field, on ten thousand pages.
Run it on your own store above, or open a sample report first.
Your report, your competitor list, and the exact fields missing. No onboarding call unless you want one.
Product and offer markup across the catalog, feed parity, llms.txt, crawler access corrected. Delivered as a pull request your developer merges, or applied by us.
We re-crawl the deployed pages and send you the before/after — same URL, same checker, timestamped.
25 buyer prompts recorded so you have a starting line, not a promise.
Same prompts, re-run. Movement or no movement, reported either way. This is what the retainer buys.
The standard fix costs the same for a 400-SKU store as a 4,000-SKU one — it's one afternoon of work either way. Program pricing depends on catalog size and how many categories you compete in, so that one gets scoped.
No call required at any tier. The $1,500 fix is a transaction, not a negotiation — that's why the number is here.
If the scan finds no defect, you don't pay — the report is yours free. If the fix doesn't deploy and re-crawl clean within 72 hours, you pay nothing. What we won't promise is a ranking: nobody can guarantee an answer engine names you, and anyone who does is selling you a story.
They can — the markup itself is a day of work. What they won't do is know which fields the engines actually consume this quarter, which your theme already emits, and which of your channels serve stale price data. You're not buying code, you're buying the map. If your developer wants to implement it, we hand them the spec and you keep the report.
Different mechanism. SEO competes for a position in a list of links; answer engines assemble one answer from sources they can parse and trust. Price and availability have to be machine-readable, and citation comes from authority — reviews, press, original research — not from keywords. We fix the parsing. We tell you honestly that the authority half is editorial work we don't do.
Yes, if we start this week. The fix is 72 hours after payment; the re-crawl is same-day. What can't be compressed is the panel — 30 days of measurement doesn't fit in 31 days to November 27. You'd get the baseline before the peak and the movement after.
Then the scan will show it, and the conversation moves to feeds, availability accuracy, and the prompt panel. About 60% of the stores we scan have partial markup — enough to look done in a theme audit, not enough to be quotable.
Leave your domain and email and you'll get the report link plus the tier you selected. If the scan comes back clean, we'll say so and you'll owe nothing.
Or run it yourself first: scan your store.